Last month the Congressional Budget Office released a paper which "reviews the major studies that evaluate the effects of state-level tort reforms and assesses the relevance of that research to similar federal proposals." ("The Effects of Tort Reform: Evidence from the States", Jun.). Although the studies cited in the survey point in a variety of directions, the paper is useful to keep on hand if only to refute some of the more extreme claims that sometimes emanate from the Litigation Lobby, such as the claim that limits on damages have not been found to reduce liability insurance premiums. The paper is described as a companion to a CBO study from October 2003, "The Economics of U.S. Tort Liability: A Primer". More: Martin Grace comments.
CBO overview of research on effectiveness of tort reform
Related Entries:
- Madison County's controversial asbestos litigation system under fire yet again
- Around the web, December 15
- Marie Gryphon cited for work on loser pays
- New Featured Discussion: MI and Cato scholars debate med-mal
- Kentucky AG Sued Over Contingency-Fee Arrangement With Private Outside Counsel
- "State Court Challenges to Legislatively Enacted Tort Reforms"
- Around the web, September 27
- Texas tort reform could be a 2012 issue
- "Trial lawyers prep for war on Perry"
- Around the web, August 19
- Tort reform in the 2012 presidential race
- Around the web, July 27
- The intellectual dishonesty of Andrew Cohen
- Around the web, June 22
- Around the web, June 18
![]() |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
![]() |
| Bridget Carroll Press Officer, Manhattan Institute bcarroll@manhattan-institute.org |



