The Supreme Court, with near-unanimity (Thomas dissenting), has decided a case involving claims in which sexual harassment law intersects with the law of "constructive discharge" -- that is to say, where complainants weren't fired but say they had to quit because the environment at work was so hostile. George Lenard analyzes the case and discusses press reaction (Jun. 14 and Jun. 15) and Michael Fox also comments (opinions courtesy Findlaw).
Pennsylvania State Police v. Suders
- Around the web, September 4
- Berkeley anti-Israel protest litigation
- Cain and sexual harassment charges II
- Cain and sexual harassment charges
- Around the web, August 3
- Jamie Leigh Jones lawsuit falling apart
- Does Title VII require work-life balance?
- Around the web, January 6
- Sexual Harassment: A Strange, Vague "Tort"
- Sexual Harassment Bait and Switch
- Prejudice and Double Standards in Sexual Harassment Cases
- Double Standards at Duke -- and in the Courts
- Sexual harassment of mall Santas
- "Friends don't let friends censor Friends"
- Wal-Mart class action
Center for Legal Policy at the