Peter Nordberg of Daubert on the Web (Jun. 6) has a thought-provoking post pointing out the surprising extent to which judicial rulings on scientific evidence helped shape the result in last week's case of Planned Parenthood v. Ashcroft, in which Judge Phyllis Hamilton struck down the Partial Birth Abortion Act of 2003.
Expert testimony and abortion bans
Related Entries:
- How much is the Bluetooth settlement injunction worth?
- Around the web, February 21
- Preempro jackpot justice verdicts in Philadelphia
- Chesley experts in two cases drop testimony
- Liability for thee, but not for me
- Texas Supreme Court finishes off Garza v. Merck
- "Win or lose, trial lawyers get millions in Vioxx fees"
- Dewey v. Volkswagen opening brief
- What the heck is going on in King County family court?
- Around the web, July 12
- Podcast on Wal-Mart v. Dukes
- $322M verdict for phantom asbestosis
- Gameshow justice: Godwin v. Electrolux Home Prods.
- Ken Feinberg and the Kentucky fen-phen suit
- Around the web, February 5
![]() |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
![]() |
| Bridget Carroll Press Officer, Manhattan Institute bcarroll@manhattan-institute.org |



