Follow POL on Twitter The trial-lawyer funded "Center for Constitutional Litigation" challenged the power of the Texas legislature to create malpractice limits to prevent runaway juries under the Seventh, Fifth, Fourteenth, and First Amendments. No dice, said a magistrate judge in Marshall, Texas. [Legal Newsline; TLR]
Federal constitutional challenge to Texas tort reform rejected
Related Entries:
- Medical malpractice reform passes House
- HR 5
- New victims of the Rothstein Ponzi scheme
- The deportation of Jakadrien Turner
- A shocking concession by Svorny on medical malpractice caps
- Marie Gryphon cited for work on loser pays
- New Featured Discussion: MI and Cato scholars debate med-mal
- November 23 roundup
- Arafiles update
- Second Circuit Interprets Prison Litigation Reform Act to Cap Attorney's Fee Award at $1.40
- "State Court Challenges to Legislatively Enacted Tort Reforms"
- Around the web, September 30
- Troy Davis
- Texas Supreme Court finishes off Garza v. Merck
 |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
 |
| Laura Eyi Press Officer, Manhattan Institute leyi@manhattan-institute.org |
