It happens so often I should just create a keystroke macro to save time blogging about it, but, yes, once again, Dahlia Lithwick got something embarrassingly wrong when trying to criticize a right-winger, this time distorting a blog post by Randy Barnett about Justice Scalia to set up a future unfair attack on Scalia if he doesn't vote on the Obamacare litigation the way Lithwick wants him to. And Ed Whelan dismantles Lithwick's typically shallow analysis of the Obamacare litigation, where she, inter alia, misrepresents the arguments of lower-court judges on the litigation. Earlier.
Dahlia Lithwick does it again
- Obamacare Debate Complete: The participant with the most compelling argument was...
- New MI report: Epstein and Hyman on PPACA
- Coming next week: featured discussion on PPACA
- Regulators at cross-purposes
- HR 5
- A new daily read: the Liberty Law Blog
- Supreme Court TV?
- Obamacare oops II
- Dahlia Lithwick does it again
- Obamacare oops
- SCOTUS Grants 5.5-Hour Oral Argument on Constitutionality of PPACA: What to Expect
- The attack on rule-of-law judges
- Scalia dissent in Sykes v. United States
- Around the web, December 10