Twenty years ago today, Stella Liebeck spilled hot McDonald's coffee on herself, and trial lawyers and their allies are still defending the idiosyncratic and absurd multi-million verdict allowing her to collect for her own accident. Thankfully, that case remains an outlier, and Starbucks, Dunkin' Donuts, Burger King, Wendy's, home brewing systems, and, yes, McDonald's, have not let the risk of customers' clumsiness keep them from continuing to serve coffee at the same (or even higher) temperatures than they did twenty years ago, to the benefit of the billions of times consumers buy coffee at the temperatures they prefer. Here's a court that got it right.
Stella Liebeck anniversary
Related Entries:
- Pane and Suffering at Apple Store on Long Island
- Around the web, February 21
- Sioux sue
- Hot coffee can cause burns at home, too
- "Porsche girl" lawsuit update
- CJD still lying about hot coffee
- DEA agent who shot himself can't sue the DEA
- "McTorts"
- San Francisco anti-Happy-Meal law doesn't work the way they wanted it to
- Questions for Susan Saladoff about "Hot Coffee"
- Lago Agrio lawyers lobbying state AGs?
- Gabriel Bonilla v. Motel 6
- Around the web, August 31
- Around the web, August 25
![]() |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
![]() |
| Laura Eyi Press Officer, Manhattan Institute leyi@manhattan-institute.org |



