An 8-1 decision correctly enforces the default freedom of contract to arbitrate in a credit-card agreement in the absence of statutory language eliminating it, but look forward to litigation lobby supporters calling it an example of pro-business bias (notwithstanding the overwhelming bipartisan support for the decision) rather than an example of the Supreme Court correcting the Ninth Circuit's anti-business bias.
Compucredit v. Greenwood
- Obamacare Debate Complete: The participant with the most compelling argument was...
- Sackett v. EPA
- Coming next week: featured discussion on PPACA
- A small victory against the EPA
- How much is the Bluetooth settlement injunction worth?
- New Podcasts: Making sense of the court order in Kiobel
- Plaintiffs' lawyers protect their cartel by bringing antitrust suit
- Kiobel debate complete
- New Featured Discussion: Kiobel and corporate liability under the Alien Tort Statute
- Update on California foreign policy efforts
- Supreme Court hears argument on Stolen Valor Act
- Ninth Circuit finds Proposition 8 same-sex marriage ban unconstitutional
- The Carlyle IPO
- Frank v. Fitzpatrick: I get to say "told you so!"
- NY Times partisan hackery department: filibuster division