PointofLaw.com
 Subscribe Subscribe   Find us on Twitter Follow POL on Twitter  
   
 
   

 

 

"Days numbered for trial lawyers getting outrageous paydays"?



I can't complain about press coverage like this. David Freddoso gets it, though the title is perhaps over-optimistic, given that self-serving class action suits are not the only source of outrageous paydays:

And these kinds of nuisance cases often cost a lot of money to defend. Most deep-pocketed defendants would rather spend a million dollars making a case like this one go away than spend millions more in litigation.

For the lawyers, this case was simple: File a lawsuit, then get a settlement agreement -- which they did. Under its terms, a hearing loss charity was to get $100,000. The lawyers were to get $800,000. And those who cranked up the volume full blast until they lost their hearing? They would basically get nothing.

The plaintiffs' lawyers put up a brave face in the National Law Journal coverage, claiming that they'll win on remand, but there is no reasonable way that good-faith application of the Ninth Circuit standard could permit settlement approval. The Aqua Dots decision would seem to preclude class certification, as well.

Related Entries:

 

 


Isaac Gorodetski
Project Manager,
Center for Legal Policy at the
Manhattan Institute
igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org

Katherine Lazarski
Press Officer,
Manhattan Institute
klazarski@manhattan-institute.org

 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.