Harvey Silverglate celebrates a Florida federal district-court ruling invalidating a state drug law as unconstitutional for lack of a mens rea requirement, but I'm less optimistic than he is that it will have long-term meaning: this is just a single trial judge and, while the U.S. Supreme Court has been skeptical of legislative overcriminalization, they haven't given any sign that they would be anywhere nearly as aggressive as this decision was. But I'll be happy if Silverglate is right.
Is mens rea constitutionally required? Shelton v. Department of Corrections
Related Entries:
- New statute would make state witness tampering a federal crime
- Bader on the Theodore Urban case
- Paul Larkin on the STOCK Act
- Day v. Persels & Associates
- Reflection on the criminal law scholarship of William Stuntz
- Supreme Court hears argument on Stolen Valor Act
- Around the web, February 21
- Distinguishing between the "public corruption amendment" and fighting public corruption
- Bill introduced to de-criminalize the Lacey Act
- New Column: Potential criminalization of traditional business relationships
- Around the web, January 27
- SOPA protests demonstrate the value of limited-government principles
- No good deed goes unpunished files
- Felon voting, Santorum, and Romney
- New Podcast: James Copland and Andrew Wise discuss 'honest services' fraud post-Skilling and the Kevin Ring trial
![]() |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
![]() |
| Laura Eyi Press Officer, Manhattan Institute leyi@manhattan-institute.org |



