26 U.S.C. ยง 3306(c)(7) excepts from the definition of "employment"—and thus exempts from the payment of employment tax—"services performed in the employ of an Indian tribe, or any instrumentality" of a tribe. Thus, the Ninth Circuit holds in Blue Lake Rancheria v. United States, a 53-member tribe can create a corporation that "hires" existing workers at other companies, rent those employees back to their original employers, and split the tax savings. Everyone wins! Except taxpayers. [Martin via Wallace]
As good an argument for tax simplification as any
Related Entries:
- How much is the Bluetooth settlement injunction worth?
- Warren Buffett and taxes III
- Update on California foreign policy efforts
- Around the web, February 21
- Cobell v. Salazar oral argument in DC Circuit
- Sioux sue
- Ninth Circuit finds Proposition 8 same-sex marriage ban unconstitutional
- What media bias? Freddie Mac edition
- "Porsche girl" lawsuit update
- "A Public Letter From the Cobell Lawyers Prompts Ethics and Harassment Concerns"
- NY Times partisan hackery department: filibuster division
- SOPA protests demonstrate the value of limited-government principles
- Obama State of the Union speech
- Adverse effects of CARD Act's limits on freedom of contract
- Compucredit v. Greenwood
![]() |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
![]() |
| Laura Eyi Press Officer, Manhattan Institute leyi@manhattan-institute.org |



