The Supreme Court limited the scope of the federal honest-services fraud law to cases of bribery and kickbacks. Zach Scruggs was convicted for his role in bribing a judge, but argued that Skilling applied to him, too. You won't be surprised to learn that the district court didn't buy that argument. [Freeland; Clarion-Ledger]
No surprises on Zach Scruggs
Related Entries:
- Scruggs tries to wiggle out of guilty plea
- Paul Larkin on the STOCK Act
- New Column: Potential criminalization of traditional business relationships
- New Podcast: James Copland and Andrew Wise discuss 'honest services' fraud post-Skilling and the Kevin Ring trial
- New Podcast: James Copland and Timothy O'Toole discuss overcriminalization concerns raised by the 'Clean Up Government Act'
- 'Clean Up Government Act' sparks overcriminalization concerns
- New 'Global Economic Crime Survey' shows decline in bribery and money laundering
- Examining 'honest services' post-Skilling
- Moving forward with FCPA reform efforts
- Promise of FCPA guidance prompts inquiries
- New Database Tracks FCPA Enforcement
- SEC Reports First FCPA Enforcement Statistics
- Around the web, September 2
- Around the web, August 25
- Around the web, August 15
![]() |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
![]() |
| Laura Eyi Press Officer, Manhattan Institute leyi@manhattan-institute.org |



