A Texas developer sued Carla Main and Encounter Books, an author and publisher respectively of a book criticizing the eminent domain practices he used—as well as Richard Epstein, who had the audacity to blurb the book. Fortunately, Texas law has procedural protections for victims of SLAPP suits, including interlocutory appeal when the trial court denies summary judgment, and an appellate court found there was no libel to be had. (This case was key in prompting Texas to pass anti-SLAPP legislation.) But there are dozens of other states where those who criticize the rich face tremendous risk of meritless libel suits to shut down their free speech rights, demonstrating the need for federal anti-SLAPP legislation. [Olson; Sullum @ Reason; IJ; Reporters' Committee; Dallas Observer; D Magazine; Main v. Royall (Tex. App. Jul. 25, 2011) (h/t W.C.)]
Free speech victory in Texas: "A great day for the First Amendment"
Related Entries:
- Federal constitutional challenge to Texas tort reform rejected
- Around the web, March 13
- Richard Epstein comments on takings law and jurisprudence
- "Porsche girl" lawsuit update
- New victims of the Rothstein Ponzi scheme
- Legitimacy of Cordray confirmation under the microscope
- The deportation of Jakadrien Turner
- Berkeley anti-Israel protest litigation
- To reform or not to reform legal education?
- Institute for Justice celebrates 20 year anniversary
- Bone marrow victory in Flynn v. Holder
- November 23 roundup
- Arafiles update
- Around the web, October 31
- Proposed Eurozone solution: sue the ratings agencies
![]() |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
![]() |
| Laura Eyi Press Officer, Manhattan Institute leyi@manhattan-institute.org |



