Follow POL on Twitter I'd love to talk about class actions, the First Amendment implications of frivolous libel suits without anti-SLAPP protection, the myth of a pro-business Supreme Court, or even "Hot Coffee", but they just want to talk to me about Caylee's Law. Here's the Delaware version of the story, quoting me. And I'll be on News Radio 680 WPTF (North Carolina) at 10:06 AM to discuss the subject.
Yes, they're still talking about Caylee's Law
Related Entries:
- New statute would make state witness tampering a federal crime
- Bader on the Theodore Urban case
- Paul Larkin on the STOCK Act
- Reflection on the criminal law scholarship of William Stuntz
- Supreme Court hears argument on Stolen Valor Act
- Around the web, February 21
- Distinguishing between the "public corruption amendment" and fighting public corruption
- Bill introduced to de-criminalize the Lacey Act
- New Column: Potential criminalization of traditional business relationships
- Around the web, January 27
- SOPA protests demonstrate the value of limited-government principles
- Felon voting, Santorum, and Romney
- New Podcast: James Copland and Andrew Wise discuss 'honest services' fraud post-Skilling and the Kevin Ring trial
- New Podcast: James Copland and Timothy O'Toole discuss overcriminalization concerns raised by the 'Clean Up Government Act'
- Around the web, December 15
 |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
 |
| Laura Eyi Press Officer, Manhattan Institute leyi@manhattan-institute.org |
