Today is 7-19. By a coincidence, as Professor Bainbridge points out, that is the record of the Ninth Circuit before the U.S. Supreme Court last term. We hear a lot of trumped-up complaining that the Supreme Court is biased towards business (though businesses only prevailed in half of the cases before the Court), but the Supreme Court is a reviewing court: when it reverses a lower court on a business-related case, it just shows that it is more pro-business than the lower court. How come no one is complaining about some of the lawless anti-business Ninth Circuit decisions that required Supreme Court reversal?
- Obamacare Debate Complete: The participant with the most compelling argument was...
- Sackett v. EPA
- Coming next week: featured discussion on PPACA
- A small victory against the EPA
- How much is the Bluetooth settlement injunction worth?
- New Podcasts: Making sense of the court order in Kiobel
- Kiobel debate complete
- New Featured Discussion: Kiobel and corporate liability under the Alien Tort Statute
- Update on California foreign policy efforts
- Supreme Court hears argument on Stolen Valor Act
- Ninth Circuit finds Proposition 8 same-sex marriage ban unconstitutional
- NY Times partisan hackery department: filibuster division
- Compucredit v. Greenwood
- Wherein George Soros wastes his money
- The myth of the pro-business Supreme Court (continued)