Mike Thompson represents California's 1st District in Congress. The District has a healthy concentration of vineyards, so it is not surprising that Thompson supports deregulation that would benefit wineries, including ending restrictions on direct interstate sales of wine. But one of those vineyards is a 20-acre affair owned by Thompson (which made him all of $18,000 last year), and the New York Times is shocked, shocked at the conflict of interest. But why stop there, Larry Ribstein asks: "Are there any lawyers in the House who write laws that benefit lawyers? Even if the House members aren't practicing law now, might they be interested in doing so in the future?" Surprisingly, this hasn't drawn as much attention from the Times.
"Scandal of the day: a businessman in Congress"
Related Entries:
- What media bias? - Romney's car elevator
- Paul Larkin on the STOCK Act
- HR 5
- Around the web, February 21
- Distinguishing between the "public corruption amendment" and fighting public corruption
- The Carlyle IPO
- What media bias? Freddie Mac edition
- NY Times partisan hackery department: filibuster division
- Setback for Chevron in fraudulent Ecuador litigation
- Reuters fact check
- CJD still lying about hot coffee
- San Francisco sick leave followup
- New Podcast: James Copland and Andrew Wise discuss 'honest services' fraud post-Skilling and the Kevin Ring trial
- Wherein George Soros wastes his money
- Trask on Prakash
![]() |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
![]() |
| Laura Eyi Press Officer, Manhattan Institute leyi@manhattan-institute.org |



