Follow POL on Twitter Can we now officially end the nonsense that this is a "pro-business" court? In a 5-3 decision authored by Chief Justice Roberts, the Supreme Court rejected the Chamber of Commerce's position that federal law preempted Arizona's E-Verify requirements. The three dissenters siding with the Chamber of Commerce (and, unusually, with federal preemption) were the liberals Breyer, Ginsburg, and Sotomayor. See also Previous discussion of the case on POL; Adler @ Volokh; Whelan; Blackman; Dow Jones]
Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting
Related Entries:
- Around the web, February 21
- At the AAJ convention: immigration, hydrofracking and the usual
- Romney and self-deporting
- Compucredit v. Greenwood
- Wherein George Soros wastes his money
- The myth of the pro-business Supreme Court (continued)
- House Judiciary Subcommittee holds hearing on enforcing foreign judgments
- Department of Labor seeks to narrow "advice exception" to disclosure laws
- Around the web, September 9
- Texas Supreme Court finishes off Garza v. Merck
- Douglas v. Independent Living Center of Southern California
- Around the web, August 3
- Breaking: DC Circuit strikes down SEC proxy access rule
- 7-19
- Roundup, July 18
 |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
 |
| Laura Eyi Press Officer, Manhattan Institute leyi@manhattan-institute.org |
