PointofLaw.com
 Subscribe Subscribe   Find us on Twitter Follow POL on Twitter  
   
 
   

 

 

Berry v. Schmidt



Kentucky state law bans lobbyists from giving to state legislative campaigns, but the state legislative ethics commission decided that an incident involving a Kentucky senator's aides asking lobbyists for money was an innocent mistake that did not warrant discipline. Attorney John M. Berry publicly criticized the commission for their inaction and that merited a full-fledged 15-month investigation and a warning letter from the state bar association. Berry sued in federal court, arguing that the disciplinary rule was facially unconstitutional because it, inter alia, barred "reckless truths," true statements made with reckless disregard for their truth or falsity; the district court held the rule was not subject to a facial challenge, and that Rooker-Feldman barred a collateral attack on the actual discipline itself. [AP/Kentucky.com]

Related Entries:

 

 


Isaac Gorodetski
Project Manager,
Center for Legal Policy at the
Manhattan Institute
igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org

Katherine Lazarski
Press Officer,
Manhattan Institute
klazarski@manhattan-institute.org

 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.