Follow POL on Twitter - What pro-business bias? Supreme Court lets stand appalling $277.5 million securities class action judgment. [LaCroix; earlier]
- Federal disability enforcement backs off the prospect of "service goats," but ADA overregulation continues. [Olson @ NYPost]
- Kozinski on overcriminalizing agency costs. [Ribstein @ TOTM]
- British "super-injunctions" not only bar certain speech, but bar speech about the injunction. [Telegraph via Boing Boing]
- The Seventh Circuit will enforce the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. (But the Drug & Device Law Blog needs to read Howard Bashman's post on linking to Seventh Circuit opinions.) [Beck; Abner v. Scott Memorial Hosp. (Posner, J.)]
Around the web, March 14
Related Entries:
- Prospective injunctive relief class actions and McNair v. Synapse Group Inc.
- New statute would make state witness tampering a federal crime
- How much is the Bluetooth settlement injunction worth?
- CCAF Seventh Circuit briefing on derivative shareholder suit standards
- Bader on the Theodore Urban case
- Paul Larkin on the STOCK Act
- Tomorrow is Poolmageddon
- Around the web, March 13
- Reflection on the criminal law scholarship of William Stuntz
- Update on California foreign policy efforts
- Supreme Court hears argument on Stolen Valor Act
- Around the web, February 21
- Distinguishing between the "public corruption amendment" and fighting public corruption
- Bill introduced to de-criminalize the Lacey Act
- Ninth Circuit finds Proposition 8 same-sex marriage ban unconstitutional
 |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
 |
| Katherine Lazarski Press Officer, Manhattan Institute klazarski@manhattan-institute.org |
