Beck has details about the decision. The good news is that Geier was not overruled, but it was substantially narrowed.
Breaking: unanimous vote against preemption in Williamson v. Mazda
Related Entries:
- $2.7 billion nanny-state regulation
- Update on California foreign policy efforts
- Greg Conko: Can brand makers be sued for generic drug injuries?
- Romney and self-deporting
- Another lawless jackpot award over propofol in Nevada
- Douglas v. Independent Living Center of Southern California
- Rehearing sought in Mensing
- Counterproductive CAFE regulations
- What media bias?
- Los Angeles to remove red-light cameras
- Out-of-state Toyota economic loss class action plaintiffs can't borrow California law
- Around the web, June 5
- Somin on federalism and tort reform
- Around the web, May 23
- Martin Act abuses
![]() |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
![]() |
| Laura Eyi Press Officer, Manhattan Institute leyi@manhattan-institute.org |



