- Iqbal/Twombly update: the Congressional threat to pleading standards. [Corporate Counsel]
- An example of those oh-so-valuable required disclosures about climate change risks. [Bainbridge]
- California courts continue to eat away at risk/benefit test. [Cal Biz Lit]
- Marlo Lewis isn't sanguine about the DOJ brief in Connecticut v. AEP Power. [Pajamas; earlier]
- The threat of OSHA expansion. [Olson @ Cato; McClellan]
- Petition for writ of mandamus in Comer makes a strong case.
- Another challenge to Louisiana med-mal caps. [Louisiana Record]
- More dishonesty in the Jane Mayer New Yorker hit-piece on the Kochs. [Bernstein @ Volokh]
- Why the 2012 election is critical: Senator Leahy expects three or four Supreme Court appointments next term. [Vermont Press Bureau/Times-Argus]
Around the web, September 1
Related Entries:
- Medical malpractice reform passes House
- Federal constitutional challenge to Texas tort reform rejected
- Obamacare Debate Complete: The participant with the most compelling argument was...
- Sackett v. EPA
- What media bias? - Romney's car elevator
- Coming next week: featured discussion on PPACA
- A small victory against the EPA
- New Podcasts: Making sense of the court order in Kiobel
- HR 5
- Kiobel debate complete
- Romney is right about the auto bailout
- New Featured Discussion: Kiobel and corporate liability under the Alien Tort Statute
- Supreme Court hears argument on Stolen Valor Act
- Around the web, February 21
- Reuters fact check
![]() |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
![]() |
| Laura Eyi Press Officer, Manhattan Institute leyi@manhattan-institute.org |



