PointofLaw.com
 Subscribe Subscribe   Find us on Twitter Follow POL on Twitter  
   
 
   

 

 

We await the invention of a litigation dispersant



Goodness knows, the use of dispersants to counteract the Gulf of Mexico oil spill warrants close attention and serious scientific follow-up. Unfortunately, it looks like Congress and the litigation industry are instead working in conjunction to maximize fear and liability over the chemicals.

On Friday, July 30, Rep. Edward J. Markey (D-MA), Chairman of the House Energy and Environment Subcommittee, released a letter and documents sent to National Incident Commander Thad Allen claiming that the U.S. Coast Guard allowed BP to use excessive amounts of "toxic dispersants" during the Gulf oil spill disaster.

And tomorrow, Aug. 4, the Senate Environmental and Public Works Committee will hold a hearing, Oversight Hearing on the Use of Oil Dispersants in the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill.

Meanwhile, last week's news and PR wires brought us these items:

One imagines a world in which dispersants were not deployed. Headline: "Groups sue over failure to use most effective anti-spill weapon."

Related Entries:

 

 


Isaac Gorodetski
Project Manager,
Center for Legal Policy at the
Manhattan Institute
igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org

Katherine Lazarski
Press Officer,
Manhattan Institute
klazarski@manhattan-institute.org

 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.