The Class Action Fairness Act created 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d), a new category of federal diversity jurisdiction for class actions that exceeded $5 million in value. The Eleventh Circuit just issued an opinion proclaiming that CAFA jurisdiction only exists when the § 1332(a) requirement of more than $75,000 in controversy applies to at least one class plaintiff. This extraordinarily tendentious reading of the statute contradicts every other circuit to examine the issue—including the Eleventh. [Trask; Andrews @ Forbes; Steinman] Expect a 9-0 per curiam decision from the Supreme Court in the near future, assuming an en banc court doesn't correct the travesty.
Cappuccitti v. DirecTV, Inc.
- Madison County's controversial asbestos litigation system under fire yet again
- Preempro jackpot justice verdicts in Philadelphia
- SCOTUS Grants 5.5-Hour Oral Argument on Constitutionality of PPACA: What to Expect
- "Something intrinsically unusual is occurring in Philadelphia"
- Obamacare SCOTUS-bound?
- More on the Eastern District of Texas
- "Patent company has big case, no office"
- Why is the Eastern District of Texas home to so many patent trolls?
- Around the web, August 15
- Around the web, July 27
- Around the web, June 22
- Alien Tort Claims Act: Kiobel cert petition
- Around the web, June 5
- CCAF objection in Stetson v. West Publishing BAR/BRI class action
- Sobel v. Hertz: CCAF objection to Nevada coupon settlement
Center for Legal Policy at the