So let us get this straight: the Obama administration thinks that when it comes to the manufacture of automobiles or pharmaceuticals in interstate commerce, it is critical to permit individual states to impose liability on design or warning-label decisions made on a nationwide basis, even when those standards are inconsistent with federal regulatory standards, but when it comes to individual state legislature decisions about local law enforcement, it is critical to enjoin that action to prevent a "patchwork" of differing state policies. Talk about upside-down federalism.
Obama administration rediscovers federal preemption
- Medical malpractice reform passes House
- HR 5
- Update on California foreign policy efforts
- Greg Conko: Can brand makers be sued for generic drug injuries?
- A new daily read: the Liberty Law Blog
- Romney and self-deporting
- The myth of the pro-business Supreme Court (continued)
- January 9 Jakadrien Turner update
- Jakadrien Turner update
- The deportation of Jakadrien Turner
- Another lawless jackpot award over propofol in Nevada
- What's in the water in Wisconsin?
- Around the web, September 9
- Douglas v. Independent Living Center of Southern California
- Rehearing sought in Mensing
Center for Legal Policy at the