Follow POL on Twitter Senator Specter, apparently concerned that Senator Dodd's financial bill wasn't bad enough, has proposed an amendment to reverse the Supreme Court's decision in Stoneridge v. Scientific Atlanta (via BLT). I discussed the perverse results of such a legal rule in the Wall Street Journal in 2007.
Specter proposes overturning Stoneridge
Related Entries:
- GAO on Stoneridge and secondary liability
- Around the web, December 28
- FCPA hearing: One of Senator Specter's farewells
- Things Congress did and didn't do before leaving, Part II
- Obama administration's $1.6 billion earmark to trial lawyers
- Conferees on financial reform reject Stoneridge amendment
- Using the financial reform conference committee to reverse Stoneridge
- Painter on Sestak's accusations
- Around the web, May 19
- Hedging their bets: Trial lawyers PAC gives to Specter, Sestak
- On the Hill this week, hearings on arbitration, Stoneridge
- Specter introduces bill to overturn Stoneridge
- Alabama, sunlight or subsidy?
- Senate Judiciary, following the Specter switch
 |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
 |
| Katherine Lazarski Press Officer, Manhattan Institute klazarski@manhattan-institute.org |
