Follow POL on Twitter At the Cato Institute magazine Regulation, Georgetown scholar John Hasnas argues that the Supreme Court took a seriously wrong turn (PDF) back in the 1909 case of New York Central & Hudson River R.R. Co. v. U.S.
John Hasnas on vicarious corporate criminal liability
Related Entries:
- Hans Bader uncovers a Catch-22 in EEOC enforcement
- Moving forward with FCPA reform efforts
- Cordray Confirmation Stalemate Continues to 'Handicap' CFPB
- Around the web, October 31
- "NLRB Postpones Worker-Notification Rule"
- Johnson & Johnson lawsuit thrown out
- California SB 469
- NLRB notice rule
- Around the web, August 31
- Around the web, August 16
- Around the web, August 15
- More on Business Roundtable v. SEC
- Around the web, July 27
- Counterproductive CAFE regulations
- Around the web, July 12
 |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
 |
| Laura Eyi Press Officer, Manhattan Institute leyi@manhattan-institute.org |
