Follow POL on Twitter Did last year's high court decision quietly create a new defense for employers to disparate impact claims? [Joseph Seiner/Benjamin Gutman, BULR/SSRN via Secunda]
Impacts of Ricci v. DeStefano
Related Entries:
- EEOC: discrimination against criminals is illegal
- Hans Bader uncovers a Catch-22 in EEOC enforcement
- Proposed HUD regulation: no discriminatory intent needed to violate Fair Housing Act
- Around the web, September 27
- "Justice's New War Against Lenders"
- Around the web, August 31
- Self-parody NY Times op-ed department: "Ugly? You May Have A Case"
- Bloomberg win on EEOC work/life balance suit
- Hymowitz on the gender gap
- "The Anti-Interference Principle"
- Damned if you do files: Briscoe v. New Haven
- Around the web, August 15
- "Disparate Impact Realism"
- Wal-Mart v. Dukes not end of world
- Taylor on Title VI disparate impact claims
 |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
 |
| Laura Eyi Press Officer, Manhattan Institute leyi@manhattan-institute.org |
