Follow POL on Twitter At Abnormal Use, a new blog on product liability from the South Carolina firm of Gallivan, White & Boyd, Laura Simons surveys the liability risks for manufacturers of cellphones and other small devices.
Distracted driving as product liability claim?
Related Entries:
- California rejects tertiary asbestos liability in O'Neill v. Crane
- First Circuit upholds $1.5M table-saw verdict
- Liability for thee, but not for me
- Texas Supreme Court finishes off Garza v. Merck
- Around the web, August 26
- New York judges more likely to acquit than juries
- Around the web, July 12
- Insurers and Toyota sudden acceleration
- What media bias?
- Around the web, June 16
- Somin on federalism and tort reform
- Around the web, May 23
- Gameshow justice: Godwin v. Electrolux Home Prods.
- Refutation of Toyota sudden acceleration hysteria doesn't stop Toyota sudden acceleration litigation
- Viscusi: "Does Product Liability Make Us Safer?"
 |
| Rafael Mangual Project Manager, Legal Policy rmangual@manhattan-institute.org |
 |
| Katherine Lazarski Manhattan Institute klazarski@manhattan-institute.org |
