Suits seeking to pin blame for birth defect "clusters" on environmental pollution have mostly fared poorly in this country, given the typically weak nature of the epidemiological and causation evidence and the hurdles posed by Daubert and other gatekeeping methods. Courts in the United Kingdom, however, have now decided to let one such potentially major case go forward. "The High Court ruled that Corby Borough Council's reclamation of a former steelworks was capable of leading to some or all of the birth defects displayed in 16 of the 18 children. The ruling could open the way to compensation claims." [Times Online, BBC, Telegraph]
Suit blaming birth defects on pollution advances in U.K.
Related Entries:
- Atrazine litigation in Madison County
- Web-only Q & A session on Stossel
- "The People v. CO2"
- Group: bankrupt chemical maker owes another $9 billion
- Louisiana judge: "gradual", "environmental" insurance exclusions don't apply to bad drywall
- "Federal Judge Tosses $100 Million Punitive Damages Award Against BP"
- Jury awards NYC $105 million in Exxon MTBE case
- Fifth Circuit reinstates climate change class action
- Wolf protection lawsuits
- Amicus briefs in TVA nuisance case
- Judge moves to ban sugar-beet crop
- "Climate lawsuits are coming, Gore & Browner warn"
- 2nd Circuit Revives "Federal Common Law of Nuisance" Suit
- NYC may have upper hand in ExxonMobil MTBE trial
![]() |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
![]() |
| Laura Eyi Press Officer, Manhattan Institute leyi@manhattan-institute.org |



