Follow POL on Twitter The Attorney General of Alabama argues that North Carolina in its suit is improperly seeking to apply its regulatory standards to industrial facilities located in other states. [Legal NewsLine]
Nuisance, the TVA, and extraterritoriality
Related Entries:
- New Podcasts: Making sense of the court order in Kiobel
- Wal-Mart v. Dukes & A.E.P. v. Connecticut
- Oral argument in AEP v. Connecticut global warming public nuisance case
- Around the web, February 13
- State-hired contingent fee counsel: Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Santa Clara
- Cert grant in American Electric Power v. Connecticut
- Litigation v. Regulation roundtable
- They say lawyers are bad at math, but this is ridiculous
- Around the web, September 1
- " Litigating over the environment makes big bucks for trial lawyers"
- Around the web, August 30
- Obama DOJ opposes carbon regulation-through-litigation
- Copland on climate-change suits
- Elizabeth Warren complains about overdisclosure
- Fourth Circuit slaps down N.C. attorney general's suit against TVA
 |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
 |
| Katherine Lazarski Press Officer, Manhattan Institute klazarski@manhattan-institute.org |
