The Attorney General of Alabama argues that North Carolina in its suit is improperly seeking to apply its regulatory standards to industrial facilities located in other states. [Legal NewsLine]
Nuisance, the TVA, and extraterritoriality
Related Entries:
- New Podcasts: Making sense of the court order in Kiobel
- Wal-Mart v. Dukes & A.E.P. v. Connecticut
- Oral argument in AEP v. Connecticut global warming public nuisance case
- Around the web, February 13
- State-hired contingent fee counsel: Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Santa Clara
- Cert grant in American Electric Power v. Connecticut
- Litigation v. Regulation roundtable
- They say lawyers are bad at math, but this is ridiculous
- Around the web, September 1
- " Litigating over the environment makes big bucks for trial lawyers"
- Around the web, August 30
- Obama DOJ opposes carbon regulation-through-litigation
- Copland on climate-change suits
- Elizabeth Warren complains about overdisclosure
- Fourth Circuit slaps down N.C. attorney general's suit against TVA
![]() |
Rafael Mangual Project Manager, Legal Policy rmangual@manhattan-institute.org |
![]() |
Communications Manhattan Institute communications@manhattan-institute.org |