Follow POL on Twitter Sherwin-Williams is claiming hometown sentiment -- as well as dodgy projections of the youth's future and capacity for college work -- did it in before a Jefferson County jury [Legal NewsLine, Jane Genova and followups here and here, defense site with motions] More: AmLaw.
Mississippi football player's lead paint win
Related Entries:
- Mississippi Supreme Court gets hellhole cleanup opportunity
- Around the web, February 17
- State-hired contingent fee counsel: Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Santa Clara
- More on the John McConnell (D.R.I.) nomination
- Senate moves slowly ...
- California Supreme Court decides Santa Clara v. Superior Court
- Committee vote set for Jack McConnell; Ron Motley honored
- In Rhode Island, campaigning on failure
- NPR lists Kagan's credentials; other nomination controversies
- "Suing the Tobacco and Lead Pigment Industry: Government Litigation as Public Health Prescription"
- Unanimous Wisconsin high court: lead pigment not defectively designed
- Wisconsin lead paint decision
- Epstein: "How Other Countries Judge Malpractice"
- $7 million Mississippi verdict against Sherwin-Williams
 |
| Rafael Mangual Project Manager, Legal Policy rmangual@manhattan-institute.org |
 |
| Communications Manhattan Institute communications@manhattan-institute.org |
