The state finally has some rules.
California electronic discovery
Related Entries:
- ยง 1920 and e-discovery costs
- Around the web, March 13
- "Twombly is the Logical Extension of the Mathews v. Eldridge Test to Discovery"
- Why is the Eastern District of Texas home to so many patent trolls?
- Loser pays in action: punishment for a patent troll
- Around the web, July 15
- How discovery rules enrich the legal profession at the expense of the social good
- "$7 million to sue Wal-Mart"?
- Around the web, June 18
- Terrible 'Sunshine in Litigation Act' rises again
- "A nation of lawyers and judges"
- Nevada Supreme Court upholds 'civil death penalty'
- Around the web, December 9
- Around the web, October 26
- In defense of Iqbal and Twombly
![]() |
Rafael Mangual Project Manager, Legal Policy rmangual@manhattan-institute.org |
![]() |
Katherine Lazarski Manhattan Institute klazarski@manhattan-institute.org |