A high court divided 5-4 gives employers a surprise victory, ruling that plaintiffs cannot prevail on the same "mixed-motive" analysis under which they could win a race or sex discrimination suit. But Congress could override the Court as it did with Ledbetter and ADA rulings, and Daniel Schwartz warns that "vast majority of ADEA cases never used the mixed motive analysis anyway. If there is circumstantial evidence of discrimination, courts traditionally allow those claims to proceed to trial."
Supreme Court on mixed-motive age cases
Related Entries:
- EEOC: discrimination against criminals is illegal
- Hans Bader uncovers a Catch-22 in EEOC enforcement
- Around the web, August 31
- Self-parody NY Times op-ed department: "Ugly? You May Have A Case"
- Bloomberg win on EEOC work/life balance suit
- Hymowitz on the gender gap
- Damned if you do files: Briscoe v. New Haven
- Around the web, August 15
- Jamie Leigh Jones lawsuit falling apart
- Podcast on Wal-Mart v. Dukes
- Does Title VII require work-life balance? II
- Does Title VII require work-life balance?
- EEOC challenges use of credit history in hiring
- Frank on Dukes
- Around the web, December 10
![]() |
Rafael Mangual Project Manager, Legal Policy rmangual@manhattan-institute.org |
![]() |
Communications Manhattan Institute communications@manhattan-institute.org |