Stephen Bainbridge criticizes both the substance of the proposal and its replacement of state with federal authority; Larry Ribstein proposes the subversive idea that maybe shareholders also deserve a "say on SOx".
Schumer's "say on pay"
Related Entries:
- Around the web, September 2
- SEC adopting strict vicarious liability?
- SEC whistleblower rules
- "Whatever Happened to IPOs?"
- Around the web, February 1
- Around the web, October 17
- "Prognosticating Free Enterprise v. PCAOB"
- "Sarbanes-Oxley Is Working Out Really Great For Michael Oxley"
- Sarbanes-Oxley before the Supreme Court
- "CEO Not Charged With Fraud But SEC Pursues Clawback Anyway"
- "The Peculiar Problem of 'Peekaboo'"
- Supreme Court to rule on constitutionality of SarbOx oversight panel
- CPSIA, collateral and Sarbanes-Oxley
- Jonathan Macey on corporate governance
![]() |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
![]() |
| Laura Eyi Press Officer, Manhattan Institute leyi@manhattan-institute.org |



