Follow POL on Twitter AEI's Michael Greve is caustically critical of the brand of federalism protected by the Supreme Court majority in Wyeth v. Levine, and warns that banking is next (via Adler @ Volokh, where there are comments).
"A malignant form of institutional competition"
Related Entries:
- Dewey v. Volkswagen opening brief
- Around the web, July 27
- Around the web, May 23
- New Jersey's jurisdictional grab, cont'd
- Oklahoma can't seek damages in chicken suit
- Korzec, "Products Liability Harmonization: A Uniform Standard"
- Guest speakers at the AAJ's summer convention
- "The U.S. Can't Be the World's Court"
- More Wyeth v. Levine reactions
- New Republic: "Pre-emption games"
- The Wyeth Case, pre-emption and federalism ctd.
- Court Rejects Preemption in Wyeth v. Levine
- AEI's Roger Bate on Wyeth v. Levine
- "The right prescription for drug safety"
 |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
 |
| Laura Eyi Press Officer, Manhattan Institute leyi@manhattan-institute.org |
