Follow POL on Twitter Richard Epstein (Chicago) versus Rick Hills (NYU), moderated by John McGinnis (Northwestern), sponsored by the Federalist Society, on audio and video (via Stier/Mass Tort Prof).
Debate on FDA preemption
Related Entries:
- New chemical regulation bill makes preemption 'impossible'
- Why preemption matters and why Waxman seeks to gut it
- Federal preemption, falling away in the motor vehicle safety bill
- State statutes purporting to opt out from Obamacare
- Trial Lawyers, Inc.: K Street -- Federal Government Relations (II)
- Pre-Emption Issue Gets Space in WaPost
- Preemption and national banks: Cuomo v. Clearing House Association, cont'd
- "Four Myths about Federal Preemption of State Tort Claims"
- Vaccine preemption
- Sotomayor, Dabit, and preemption
- "As a policy matter we think that defibrillators are a product as to which preemption is peculiarly appropriate"
- NYU preemption symposium
- Federal District Judge Rules Drug Pre-emption Still Valid Defense
- Copland and Howard: a proposal for drug-injury administrative compensation
 |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
 |
| Laura Eyi Press Officer, Manhattan Institute leyi@manhattan-institute.org |
