In a new paper for the Washington Legal Foundation (PDF), Bruce Mandel and James Kline of Ulmer & Berne commend the court for its greater deference to the legislature's role in shaping tort law (via Stier/Mass Tort Prof). "As a result, the landscape in Ohio for businesses and product liability defendants has improved considerably." Earlier coverage of the court is here.
Ohio Supreme Court and tort law, cont'd
Related Entries:
- Madison County's controversial asbestos litigation system under fire yet again
- Around the web, December 15
- Marie Gryphon cited for work on loser pays
- New Featured Discussion: MI and Cato scholars debate med-mal
- Kentucky AG Sued Over Contingency-Fee Arrangement With Private Outside Counsel
- "State Court Challenges to Legislatively Enacted Tort Reforms"
- Around the web, September 27
- Texas tort reform could be a 2012 issue
- "Trial lawyers prep for war on Perry"
- Around the web, August 19
- Tort reform in the 2012 presidential race
- Around the web, July 27
- The intellectual dishonesty of Andrew Cohen
- Around the web, June 22
- Around the web, June 18
![]() |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
![]() |
| Laura Eyi Press Officer, Manhattan Institute leyi@manhattan-institute.org |



