Courthouse News: "A divided 9th Circuit ruled that U.S. courts might not be the right venue for Papua New Guinea residents to litigate their claims that British mining company Rio Tinto incited a savage 10-year civil war. A plurality of judges remanded the case to determine whether 'prudential exhaustion analysis' applies and, if so, whether the plaintiffs must exhaust their remedies in Papua New Guinea before proceeding in U.S. courts." (via Above the Law). Bloomberg also reports, the opinions are here, and Howard Bashman has more about the court's unusually complicated five-way (!) split. Our extensive coverage of Alien Tort Statute litigation can be found here.
Alien Tort Claims: 9th Circuit skeptical on Papua New Guinea/Rio Tinto case
- New Podcasts: Making sense of the court order in Kiobel
- New Featured Discussion: Kiobel and corporate liability under the Alien Tort Statute
- Around the web, August 11
- Insurers and Toyota sudden acceleration
- Alien Tort Claims Act: Kiobel cert petition
- $322M verdict for phantom asbestosis
- Breaking: 2nd Circuit Rules No Corporate Liability in Alien Tort Statute Cases
- Beaumont, Texas turning away venue-shoppers?
- Shell Settles ATCA Nigeria Suit
- "Lawsuits target oil company operations overseas"
- Jury vindicates Chevron in Nigeria brutality case
- Perforce, Court Allows Alien Tort Claims Act Suits to Proceed
- More thoughts on the internationalization of tort
- The Alien Tort Claims Act: the next encroachment in the rule of lawyers?