Follow POL on Twitter Prof. Chemerinsky is out with a new book that (per John McGinnis's review in today's WSJ) proposes letting plaintiffs pick either a federal or a state forum, whichever they think will prove most favorable, to enforce their rights under federal law. He's not crazy about knocking out state law through pre-emption, either. More: Althouse.
Forum-shoppers' delight?
Related Entries:
- Update on California foreign policy efforts
- Greg Conko: Can brand makers be sued for generic drug injuries?
- Romney and self-deporting
- Madison County's controversial asbestos litigation system under fire yet again
- Preempro jackpot justice verdicts in Philadelphia
- "Something intrinsically unusual is occurring in Philadelphia"
- Another lawless jackpot award over propofol in Nevada
- More on the Eastern District of Texas
- "Patent company has big case, no office"
- Why is the Eastern District of Texas home to so many patent trolls?
- Douglas v. Independent Living Center of Southern California
- Around the web, July 27
- Rehearing sought in Mensing
- Around the web, June 5
- Somin on federalism and tort reform
 |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
 |
| Laura Eyi Press Officer, Manhattan Institute leyi@manhattan-institute.org |
