Brian Stimson (Alston & Bird) has a working paper from WLF (press release) on how prosecutors are using the False Claims Act "as a tool for enforcing compliance with federal health care quality standards". Under something known as the "implied false certification doctrine," accepted by some courts, "implied misrepresentations of statutory, regulatory, and contractual compliance are as actionable as express falsehoods" -- which can have the effect of turning the FCA into a general federal health law barbed with treble-damage provisions as well as per-incident fines, even in cases where patients were not harmed or duplicative or unneeded services billed for.
"The False Claims Act: A Proper Tool for Enforcing Health Care Quality Standards?"
Related Entries:
- An employee's revenge
- "Whistle-Blowers' Experiences in Fraud Litigation against Pharmaceutical Companies"
- Examiner on whistleblower law
- "Obama signs bill amending False Claims Act"
- Katrina whistleblower litigation, cont'd
- After Allison Engine
- Congratulations to Beck and Herrmann
- Around the Web, May 2
- "False Claims Act Corrections Act"
- Allison Engine podcast
- "Polluting Medical Judgment? False Assumptions in the Pursuit of False Claims Regarding Off-Label Prescribing"
![]() |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
![]() |
| Laura Eyi Press Officer, Manhattan Institute leyi@manhattan-institute.org |



