PointofLaw.com
 Subscribe Subscribe   Find us on Twitter Follow POL on Twitter  
   
 
   

 

 

Antitrust damages to state economies



The implacable in pursuit of the unknowable? In Connecticut, Virginia and Nevada, legislation provides that state legal officers may sue antitrust offenders for the notional general damage done to the states' economies by the economic offenses charged. The Connecticut Supreme Court on that basis has just green-lighted AG Richard Blumenthal's legal action against insurance broker Marsh & McLennan, rejecting Marsh's argument that the economic damage theory inherently involves double-counting of damages already included in private parties' right to sue. (Legal NewsLine; opinion, PDF).

P.S. Correspondent Skip Oliva of the Voluntary Trade Council writes, "Of course, no state AG would ever consider the possibility that antitrust itself does far more damage to the economy by removing private capital from the market."

Related Entries:

 

 


Rafael Mangual
Project Manager,
Legal Policy
rmangual@manhattan-institute.org

Katherine Lazarski
Manhattan Institute
klazarski@manhattan-institute.org

 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.