PointofLaw.com

spacer FORUM FEATURED DISCUSSIONS PoL COLUMNS LEGAL EXPERTS ARTICLES BOOKS LINKS MASTHEAD ADVANCED SEARCH

FORUM

« Lerach: keep my sentencing briefs under seal | Contentious Contingent Fee Research »

February 01, 2008


Oregon Supreme Court plays chicken in Williams v. Philip Morris case

After being reversed twice by the U.S. Supreme Court, including in last term's Philip Morris v. Williams case (Oct. 26, 2006; Feb. 20, 2007; much more), the Oregon Supreme Court has once again reaffirmed the $79.5 million punitive damages award. Steenson has details. SCOTUS avoided addressing the issue of excessiveness of damages, so the Oregon Supreme Court's decision is a direct challenge to that jurisprudence. The Court is going to be faced with the need to write a "No, this time we really mean it" reversal, or effectively undo its precedents in the area. (Update: Turkewitz suggests the latter outcome is likely.)

Posted by Ted Frank at 07:31 AM | TrackBack (0)



categories:
Judiciary
Supreme Court









 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.