More on the controversy covered here and here, about the terms reached by duPont in its pact with Rhode Island attorney general Patrick Lynch and many-tentacled law firm Motley Rice. Were earmarks of $2.5 million to a Boston hospital and $1 million to Brown University designed to advance the private interests of the law firm and the AG, respectively? Sherwin-Williams, which cut no deal with the state and remains a defendant, has now asked a judge to undo the two donations. LegalNewsLine and Jane Genova cover the story. (More: Hans Bader).
R.I./duPont lead pact, cont'd
- Mississippi Supreme Court gets hellhole cleanup opportunity
- Around the web, February 17
- State-hired contingent fee counsel: Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Santa Clara
- More on the John McConnell (D.R.I.) nomination
- Senate moves slowly ...
- California Supreme Court decides Santa Clara v. Superior Court
- Committee vote set for Jack McConnell; Ron Motley honored
- In Rhode Island, campaigning on failure
- NPR lists Kagan's credentials; other nomination controversies
- "Suing the Tobacco and Lead Pigment Industry: Government Litigation as Public Health Prescription"
- Mississippi football player's lead paint win
- Unanimous Wisconsin high court: lead pigment not defectively designed
- Wisconsin lead paint decision
- $7 million Mississippi verdict against Sherwin-Williams
- Rhode Island: Motley Rice's McConnell tagged for federal bench
Center for Legal Policy at the