PointofLaw.com
 Subscribe Subscribe   Find us on Twitter Follow POL on Twitter  
   
 
   

 

 

Cause in Fact and Vioxx, part N



This Newark Star Ledger [thanks to ILR] report on a case to be argued before the New Jersey Supremes today is a significant one.

You might have caused me damage (though you probably didn't cause me any). Must you pay for testing to check to see if you caused me damage? No, says traditional common law "preponderance of the evidence" doctrine.

 

 


Rafael Mangual
Project Manager,
Legal Policy
rmangual@manhattan-institute.org

Katherine Lazarski
Manhattan Institute
klazarski@manhattan-institute.org

 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.