FORUM
« How well lawyered was the Lynne Stewart invitation? |
Another thimerosal-vindicating study »
September 28, 2007
Around the web, September 28
- Insurers fight Referendum 67 with TV ads invoking fictional law firm of Sooem Settle & Kashin, Washington State Trial Lawyers Association says that's "slanderous" [Seattle Times, NW Republican]
- Missouri judge rejects state-constitution challenge to school finance [AP/SEMissourian]
- Touting of lawsuits to recoup public costs of meth abuse from OTC drug makers "sounds like a commercial for the Publishers Clearing House Sweepstakes" [Coyote]
- When to settle your malpractice case as a defendant (even if you feel you did everything right) [Medical Economics via KevinMD]
- Reactions to court's dismissal of the California automaker/greenhouse gas suit [WSJ Energy Blog, attorney Richard Faulk @ Law and More, Dan Walters]
- "Very likely" that Madison County "will not be listed as a judicial hellhole this year," says ATRA's Darren McKinney [Post-Dispatch]
- Law.com takes a look at Justice Department's stepped-up use of corporate monitoring in plea deals [Corporate Counsel]
Posted by Walter Olson at 12:06 AM
| TrackBack (0)
|
categories:
Products Liability
|
|