PointofLaw.com

FORUM FEATURED DISCUSSIONS PoL COLUMNS LEGAL EXPERTS ARTICLES BOOKS PODCASTS LINKS MASTHEAD ADVANCED SEARCH

FORUM

« Silicosis mass screenings ruled improper | Epstein and Greve: "preemption and federalism are not polar opposites" »

June 06, 2007


Floyd Abrams on Islamic Society of Boston

In today's Wall Street Journal:

The case offers two enduring lessons. The first is that those who think about suing for libel should think again before doing so. And then again once more. While all the ultimate consequences to the Islamic Society for bringing the lawsuit remain uncertain, any adverse consequences could have been avoided by not suing in the first place.

The second lesson is that in one way (and perhaps no other) we should learn from the English system and award counsel fees to the winning side in cases like this, which are brought to inhibit speech on matters of serious public import. Because all the defendants in this case were steadfast and refused to settle, they were eventually vindicated. But the real way to avoid meritless cases such as this is to have a body of law that makes clear that plaintiffs who bring them will be held financially responsible for doing so.

In Overlawyered: May 30; May 17.

Posted by Ted Frank at 08:03 AM | TrackBack (0)



categories:
Loser Pays









 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.