PointofLaw.com

spacer FORUM FEATURED DISCUSSIONS PoL COLUMNS LEGAL EXPERTS ARTICLES BOOKS LINKS MASTHEAD ADVANCED SEARCH

FORUM

« County of Santa Clara v. Atlantic Richfield, cont'd | European CEOs: Litigation deters investment in US »

May 20, 2007


Milberg indictment, one year later

Nathan Koppel at WSJ Law Blog has a roundup. Key paragraph:

Some lawyers predicted that the indictment would be a swift death knell to Milberg. Arthur Andersen, after all, closed shop shortly after its 2002 indictment for allegedly destroying documents related to its Enron audits. Perhaps the reputational damage from an indictment poses a graver threat to a firm hired to audit financial statements than a firm hired to file lawsuits. Another thought: A defense-side law firm would arguably be hurt worse by an indictment. It’s hard to imagine corporate titans turning to a firm under a cloud.

Our coverage is here and here.

Posted by Walter Olson at 01:04 AM | TrackBack (0)



categories:
Class Actions









 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.