Subscribe Subscribe   Find us on Twitter Follow POL on Twitter  



Two views on Joan Biskupic

Compare and contrast the takes of Ed Whelan and Mark Obbie on the same Biskupic analysis of the Roberts court.

Entertaining update: Michael Krauss notes that Obbie has updated his post to account for Whelan's critique, though Obbie throws in a churlish slam of Whelan suffering from the same sort of discounting of conservative views that Whelan criticizes. Is biased coverage better than no coverage? Depends on your bias, I suppose. It would be nice to see a news analysis addressing the fact that the conservative justices have a generally coherent view of the constitution, while the liberal wing of the Court has an ad hoc approach that turns the judicial branch into a superlegislature.

Update to the update: Ed Whelan expands his critique.



Rafael Mangual
Project Manager,
Legal Policy

Manhattan Institute


Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.