December 20, 2006

Compare and contrast the takes of Ed Whelan and Mark Obbie on the same Biskupic analysis of the Roberts court.

Entertaining update: Michael Krauss notes that Obbie has updated his post to account for Whelan's critique, though Obbie throws in a churlish slam of Whelan suffering from the same sort of discounting of conservative views that Whelan criticizes. Is biased coverage better than no coverage? Depends on your bias, I suppose. It would be nice to see a news analysis addressing the fact that the conservative justices have a generally coherent view of the constitution, while the liberal wing of the Court has an ad hoc approach that turns the judicial branch into a superlegislature.

Update to the update: Ed Whelan expands his critique.