PointofLaw.com
 Subscribe Subscribe   Find us on Twitter Follow POL on Twitter  
   
 
   

 

 

Merck Wins Another Vioxx Suit



As the W$J reports, Merck has won another one.

A federal jury on Wednesday cleared Merck of liability for a 2003 nonfatal heart attack suffered by a Utah bank manager who had taken Vioxx for more than 10 months.

Charles Mason, a 64-year-old from Salt Lake County, Utah, switched to Vioxx after years of taking anti-inflammatory drugs because of back pain. He was seeking about $690,000 in lost wages and other damages.


Merck attorneys, in closing arguments Wednesday, said Vioxx had nothing to do with Mr. Mason's heart attack because he took the once-popular painkiller for less than a year and stopped taking it four days before his heart attack.

Mr. Mason's attorney, Ed Blizzard, countered that the drug's effects didn't go away between the Monday that Mason began taking a different painkiller for chest pains and the Friday of his heart attack.

 

 


Rafael Mangual
Project Manager,
Legal Policy
rmangual@manhattan-institute.org

Katherine Lazarski
Manhattan Institute
klazarski@manhattan-institute.org

 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.