Much coverage of the asbestos debacle has focused on the collapse of very large firms such as Owens-Corning, Babcock & Wilcox, Armstrong World Industries and so on. However, many small firms without particularly deep pockets get entangled too. In Gulfport, Miss., it was reported last year that 40-employee Phillips Building Supply "is a defendant in more than 39 lawsuits" over asbestos, silica and allegedly not-protective-enough face masks. "Bill Hough, president of Phillips, said trial lawyers sued his company along with [bigger] corporations simply to keep the cases in state courts, which have been more apt to award large monetary verdicts than federal courts." (Tom Wilemon, "Small businesses in lawsuit crossfire", Biloxi Sun-Herald, Jun. 17, 2003). Among not-so-big manufacturers affected has been Vermont's Rutland Fire Clay Company, maker of fireplace supplies and joint compound, driven to the bankruptcy courts in 1999 after 116 years in business.
Asbestos suits: a small business problem, too
Related Entries:
- Judge orders end to trial reservation system in Madison County asbestos docket
- ยง 1920 and e-discovery costs
- The problem of the special master
- Asbestos litigation and search-engine optimization
- "When Lawyers Become Trolls"
- California rejects tertiary asbestos liability in O'Neill v. Crane
- NYC Transit Authority forbids drivers from calling police?
- Madison County's controversial asbestos litigation system under fire yet again
- Defensive customer service
- Cain and sexual harassment charges
- Study: patent trolls cost at least $500 billion
- Congressional hearing on asbestos fraud
- Obama's American Jobs Act to create lawyer jobs
- Judge orders lawyers to mandatory Labor-Day weekend seminar
- "Twombly is the Logical Extension of the Mathews v. Eldridge Test to Discovery"
![]() |
Rafael Mangual Project Manager, Legal Policy rmangual@manhattan-institute.org |
![]() |
Katherine Lazarski Manhattan Institute klazarski@manhattan-institute.org |