PointofLaw.com
 Subscribe Subscribe   Find us on Twitter Follow POL on Twitter  
   
 
   

 

 

Litigation-driven studies



Legal Affairs recently hosted a debate between Michael L. Martinez of Crowell & Moring and Jay P. Kesan of the University of Illinois on the question of how courts should treat "litigation-driven scholarship", that is to say, studies and research projects that may have been undertaken with a mind to influencing legal outcomes. Prof. Childs takes note of a "curious" aspect of the debate's introduction, namely its premise that only research commissioned by defendants is potentially problematic in this way. He writes: "My work (see the current article on SSRN) suggests that, while defense-funded studies are not unheard of, most such research is performed on behalf of plaintiffs' counsel." Peter Nordberg also comments, here and here.

 

 


Isaac Gorodetski
Project Manager,
Center for Legal Policy at the
Manhattan Institute
igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org

Katherine Lazarski
Press Officer,
Manhattan Institute
klazarski@manhattan-institute.org

 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.